April 6th, 2010

EXIT Realty Corp. International and Onboard Informatics Announce Home Search Integration Partnership

pressrealeaseEXIT Realty Corp. International and Onboard Informatics today announced a strategic alliance to bring a fresh, online home search experience to today’s savvy consumer.

Based on Onboard’s revolutionary Lifestyle Listings Engine, instead of being restricted to searching for their new home by price, bedrooms and bathrooms, consumers will also be able to search for homes within a specified commuting distance to work or family, proximity to neighborhood amenities or myriad other search criteria in keeping with the way they live their lives today.

“EXIT Realty has thoroughly researched the players in the real estate data industry and are proud to align with such an innovative and well-respected company as Onboard,” said Steve Morris, EXIT Realty’s Founder and CEO.

“EXIT Realty is a company who recognizes the importance of providing cutting edge search technology to both broker and consumer websites,” says Marc Siden, Onboard Informatics’ CEO. “The integration of lifestyle search parameters with our core data sets, enable a powerful IDX solution for brokers and website visitors. We are pleased to be an integral part of EXIT Realty’s strategic initiatives and are honored that they have selected us as their key partner.”

The website, which will be designed entirely in-house by EXIT Realty’s expert team of web developers, is scheduled to launch later this year and will integrate Onboard’s extensive Listings Web Service Platform, their Internet Data Exchange solution, with their highly accurate and robust community and demographics data pools.  Onboard’s service is designed to allow integration of IDX search capabilities into MLS approved broker websites quickly and efficiently with consistent searches across markets. Onboard has designed a highly efficient system designed to streamline the process with the various MLS services and have implemented high security measures to ensure listing display compliancy.

“We strategically delayed incorporating a home search feature on our corporate website until the perfect storm of players and technology was achieved,” said Susan Harrison, EXIT Realty’s Senior VP Web Development.  “That time is now.”

About EXIT Realty: Founded in Canada in 1996, EXIT Realty is a proven real estate business model that supplies multiple sources of income – for agents, security, stability and direction; for agents’ families, security in the form of beneficiary and retirement residuals. Taking the U.S. by storm starting in 1999, EXIT Realty sold over half of the regional rights by population in under 365 days, was named as one of the Top 10 Trendsetters of 2007 by the Swanepoel Trends report, and Steve Morris was named one of REALTOR® Magazine’s 25 Most Influential Thought Leaders. A portion of every transaction fee collected by EXIT International is applied to its charitable fund and to-date, $1.68 Million has been pledged to Habitat for Humanity in both Canada and the U.S. Please visit EXIT Realty Corp. International for more information.

About Onboard Informatics: Since 2001, Onboard Informatics has provided comprehensive local, regional and national real estate data solutions, powerful Web tools and Web services to some of the most innovative companies in the real estate, publishing, and technology.  Onboard delivers seamless integration of property listings, community, school, neighborhood, geographic and demographic information to support clients in achieving business objectives on Web and mobile platforms.  Privately held since its founding, Onboard is located in the heart of the world’s financial center in the Wall Street area of New York City.

Tags: , , , , .

January 6th, 2010

Building a Listings Platform with Trust and Transparency

climbing

You may recall that in September, we announced our new Listings Web Service. Our team has been working relentlessly in Q4 to enhance this product while fostering trusting relationships with MLSs and bringing you inside our doors to understand the progressions, we as a company, have made.

Onboard began delivering IDX capabilities in early 2009. Since then, we have built direct relationships with each MLS, in our pipeline, to gain access to IDX data on behalf of our clients. We host and maintain the listings data as well as administer secure access. All of our neighborhood content is also available with various standardized search parameters. We feel these two pieces of information are vital to anyone involved in any stage of a property transaction.

As data providers we understand the importance of data integrity and potential misuse of data. We take extra measures to ensure listings on our clients’ websites are presented in compliance with MLS rules and regulations and only available to approved members of the various MLSs. We have also recently introduced additional security measures to ensure MLS data is even better-protected against unauthorized use.

Although we are not new in the real estate space, entering the world of listings presented some challenges. However, we believe in determination and perseverance, and most importantly, that the foundation of any strong and lasting relationship is built on trust and transparency. This is just one of the key ingredients to our success, which has enabled us to gain over 100 MLS boards nationwide.

Building a fully-functional and innovative Listings/IDX platform from the ground up takes time to ripen, so our team was also strategic in developing our coverage plans. Fifty percent of our coverage is concentrated in the two hottest real estate areas of the country: the West and the South.  Today, we can provide clients with access to over 1.8 million listings or roughly 50% of the estimated total U.S. inventory, a number growing each week as we continue to expand coverage.

Thousands of board-approved agents are now supported by our Listings Web Service. We look forward to providing the benefits of our one-of-a-kind Listings Web Service to even more real estate professionals in the coming year. We also look forward to building new relationships and working alongside great people supporting this effort who don’t normally get the recognition they deserve – you know who you are.

As always, feel free to reach out to me with any questions you have regarding the product itself or our coverage areas.

Tags: , , , , .

August 26th, 2009

Onboard Informatics Selects LPS Real Estate Group to Deliver Data Aggregation Services

pressrealeaseNew York, NY. August 26, 2009 – Onboard Informatics, the premier data services provider to top-tier real estate, media and technology companies, has selected LPS Real Estate Group, Inc.’s Data Aggregation Services to process and standardize real estate data for Onboard Informatics’ clients. Formerly known as Cyberhomes and FNRES MLS, LPS Real Estate Group is a wholly owned subsidiary of Lender Processing Services, Inc. (NYSE:LPS), a leading provider of integrated technology and services to the mortgage and real estate industries.

The agreement between the two companies helps to speed the delivery of Multiple Listing Service (MLS) Internet Data Exchange (IDX) data to Onboard and its customers. LPS Real Estate Group provides data services for clients using its standardization process for millions of active property listings from more than 400 MLS boards across the country.  When Onboard completes its licensing agreement with a new MLS area, LPS Real Estate Group will quickly deliver its comprehensive data aggregation services, which include importing MLS listing data from hundreds of different systems, placing the data and photos into standardized formats, checking the files for corruption and validating key elements like addresses. By completing the “heavy lifting” of complex data aggregation and formatting, LPS Real Estate Group will dramatically reduce Onboard’s set-up time and expense.

The highly successful January 2009 launch of Onboard’s Lifestyle Listing Engine (LLE) resulted in a dramatic increase in demand to expand MLS market coverage. Onboard responded to their customers’ requirements by working with LPS Real Estate Group to reduce the time and expense needed to meet the expansion demand.

Marc Siden, CEO of Onboard, said: “Onboard’s new agreement with LPS Real Estate Group will allow our clients to quickly gain the benefit of a national MLS footprint. Our analysis determined that LPS Real Estate Group provided the most reliable, timely, cost-effective data aggregation service in the market. The relationship also will enable our highly qualified internal teams to continue to focus on what we do best – providing the best solutions to our client base through our unique and ever-evolving products and services.”

Commenting on the agreement, Larry Ross, General Manager of Listing Aggregation for LPS Real Estate Group, said: “We are delighted that Onboard has chosen us as their listing aggregation solution.  We are confident that our data aggregation service, which is the most comprehensive in the industry, will allow Onboard to successfully meet its business objectives, and we look forward to a long and mutually beneficial relationship.”

About Onboard Informatics

Since 2001, Onboard Informatics has provided comprehensive local, regional and national real estate data solutions, powerful web tools and web services to some of the most innovative companies in real estate, media, and technology industries.

Onboard combines its expertise in data aggregation, standardization, and integration with expert consulting, transforming the complexity of data into meaningful solutions to support their clients in achieving business objectives.  Privately held since its founding, Onboard is located in the heart of the world’s financial center in the Wall Street area of New York City.  For more information about Onboard Informatics or to request a demo, visit www.onboardinformatics.com.

About Lender Processing Services

LPS is a leading provider of integrated technology and services to the mortgage industry. LPS offers solutions that span the mortgage continuum, including lead generation, origination, servicing, workflow automation (Desktop) portfolio retention and default, augmented by the company’s award-winning customer support and professional services. Approximately 50 percent of all U.S. mortgages by volume are serviced using LPS’ Mortgage Servicing Package (MSP). In fact, many of the nation’s top servicers rely on MSP, including eight of the top 10 and 14 of the top 20. LPS also offers proprietary mortgage and real estate data and analytics for the mortgage and capital markets industries. For more information about LPS, please visit www.lpsvcs.com.

The LPS Real Estate Group has relationships with more than 300 MLS organizations, 250 broker companies, settlement services companies, and more than 350,000 real estate professionals. The technology applications include innovative tools such as Paragon™;  the reInsight™ collection; rDesk® Broker & Agent Suite of products; TransactionPoint®; DocCentral; Cyberhomes; the Real Estate & Living Media Network that generates revenue for its  publishers; as well as a robust real estate property and tax database that includes 285 million residential and commercial property, ownership, sales, assessment and mortgage records. This represents detailed information on at least 92 percent of U.S. property ownership records in more than 2,000 counties with over 648,000 new ownership records added monthly.  For more information about LPS Real Estate Group, please visit www.lpsreg.com.

# # #

Onboard Informatics Contact:

Stacey Ret, Director, Marketing
Onboard Informatics
sret@onboardinformatics.com
646-747-4395

LPS Real Estate Group Media Contact:

Laura Buser, VP, Marketing & Communications
Laura.buser@lpsvcs.com
949-681-4852

Tags: , , .

April 1st, 2009

In Which I Reassure Nicolai Kolding About “Foripollas”

Nicolai Kolding, COO, Better Homes & Gardens Real Estate

Nicolai Kolding

For those who don’t know, Nicolai Kolding is the COO of Better Homes & Gardens Real Estate, and one of the smartest people in real estate.  It is actually a treat to be able to read his thoughts on a blog, and Realogy really has to be congratulated for lifting the barriers a little bit.  (Now if they would only go ahead and let everyone at One Campus do some blogging….)

His latest post is an interesting read, and one that is bound to generate a ton of conversation, but it hit on so much that is central to what we do here at Onboard Informatics, that I felt compelled to engage in futurism and commentary.

Nicolai describes a conversation he had “at a small, private dinner in Manhattan attended by… global power players (some from China, Russia, and Dubai) that we usually only read about.”  In said conversation, he apparently learned about a whole new concept in brokerage that will “disrupt every aspect of the real estate transaction as we now know it”:

I’m convinced that what I heard was not a theoretical conversation.  As I think about it, it all seems entirely plausible; the combination of a woeful economy with decreased consumer wealth and satisfaction has created a perfect storm.  And, I have to tell you, I’m now sure these players have the ability and willingness to pounce.

Here’s what I could gather:

  • It’s completely virtual – no offices.  I can’t even tell if there are to be agents but I assume no.
  • Massive content aggregation.
  • Massive listings aggregation.
  • Everything translatable into many major languages.
  • Search: for starters, the consumer can either search by exact property or do a general search by location, house size/style/value, neighborhood type, and some other really funky and creative attributes.
  • An almost Priceline-esque reverse auction component that will take the idea of making offers to unchartered waters.
  • An “optimal” pricing/valuation algorithm with a variable time component that allows users to calculate a home value today, tomorrow, and over decades based on their predictors.  In other words, the consumer would be looking at an analysis of not only what the home should be valued at now (based on whatever data is being fed into this) but what the best price will be and when.  Heaven knows what kind of assumptions are going into this.
  • A tie-in to a bidding of mortgage rates so that the valuation/rate data is crossed to generate a dollars-per-month optimization.
  • There was a lot more to this including some kind of a semantic web 3.0 component that allows the system to recognize users’ preferences and populate their private pages automatically.

I wish I had something more tangible to go with but I’m hoping someone out there does.  From everything I could gather, there seems to be a multi-market launch being prepared for the not-too-distant future.

This concept is going under the name (which Nicolai sort of remembered from the convo) that is something like “Foripollas”.  We don’t know what the actual name of the concept/company is, so we’ll go with Foripollas for now.

The Grand Vision

From the very start of the popular Internet (dating to somewhere around 1996/1997 after Netscape brought the military-academic complex of the Internet to the masses), one of the grand visions was the idea that direct exchange of information enabled by the Web will eliminate the middleman in virtually every transaction.  Additionally, books like the Transparent Market painted a future in which everything bought and sold approached the liquidity and transparency of the stock market as near-zero cost of information distribution and sharing led to near-perfect knowledge of pricing and value.

Ebay.com is probably the poster child for this vision.

But on the other hand, Priceline.com is probably the best known counter-argument.  Initially hailed as the model that would change everything as we know it, Priceline became the butt of jokes when the dotcom bubble burst and its stock price went into the pennies.  Priceline then had to change its model entirely in order to survive:

More recently, it has moved to a more traditional model where travelers are presented prices and are also told the name of the establishment. Travelers can still choose to name their price but the number of participants in that program has significantly diminished.

In real estate, companies such as CityFeet.com launched with the vision of leveraging the Internet to change Real Estate As We Know It by directly connecting landlords with tenants, but quickly realized that they could not succeed by alienating the real estate professional.  Closer to home, FSBO websites have made some inroads, but it seems clear that they haven’t exactly bankrupted real estate brokerages.

Technology Has Changed, But Human Beings Not So Much

Ten years later, while there have been massive advances in technology of the web, it’s hard to say that human nature has changed all that much.

Sure, we have advanced XML, web services, SOA, SaaS, mashups, interactive mapping, and cloud computing today that we didn’t back in 1999-2000, which makes what Foripollas might do intriguing… but I rather think buyers and sellers of real estate haven’t changed that much.

We’ve been conducting interview of consumers on their real estate search experience (and we’re in the process of trying to edit some dozen hours of video into something more useful).  And one of the really surprising things we’ve learned is that consumers absolutely want to use a realtor in that process.  Sometimes the reason is that even though they have done extensive research about the area, schools, amenities, and looked through dozens of listings, before they go see homes in person, they want someone who is a local expert who knows real estate to give them professional insights.  Another reason is that some people, even after having done all the research, just want the service of having someone else do the paperwork for them.

Removing the Veil

Having said that, Foripollas represents a major step forward in real estate web.  We at Onboard have been privileged to have been working with the founders for the past five months, and since Nicolai let the cat out of the bag, we may as well talk a little bit about the project.

First, the name isn’t Foripollas, but Foropillas — which is Greek for “central pillars”.  (The founder is originally from Greece, and the main investor is a major VC from Athens.)  The technology that the Foropillas team has developed, with help from Onboard, is something they feel can be the central pillar around which online real estate can be constructed.

Second, Foropillas will launch will a full panoply of community, schools, and business locations data, all drawn from Onboard’s unparalleled database.  If it’s something that’s been put into a database, we have it, and have provided it to Foropillas.  In some cases — such as detailed service data on a house — the consumer or homeowner will need to provide permission to make that information public, but at launch, everything from median income to walkability to education levels and type of employment will be easily accessible on page, and on map.

We’ve also worked with Foropillas to integrate our 50,000+ local neighborhood boundaries into their search and display interface.

Critically, Foropillas hasn’t simply leveraged all the data for the corporate website.  They have integrated all of the data, and the analytics it enables, into full suite of agent report tools.  Any Foropillas agent can quickly pull a report on an area, with in-depth school information, area trends, demographics, psychographics, and market values (along with trending) in a few minutes’ time.

Third, Foropillas represents the first major launch of the Lifestyle Listings Engine.  Nicolai wasn’t far off with his description; if anything, he wasn’t told about the real change our LLE makes possible for Foropillas.  In addition to the traditional zip/bed/bath/price search, Foropillas has map-based search (with full neighborhood and data layers right on top of the map), as well as Lifestyle Search and The Obilizer(TM).

Lifestyle Search works precisely as it sounds: you search by your lifestyle preferences using a mix of natural language and filter options.  “Show me homes in $300K range, with medical facilities within 5 minutes, walking distance to a cafe, and 15 minute commute to work” is a typical search.

The Obilizer is basically e-Harmony for real estate.  A consumer enters personal demographic and psychographic information, such as favorite magazines, how often they eat out, age, education level, and so on.  The Obilizer engine then breaks every neighborhood in the U.S. down by psychographic profile leveraging our deep database of consumer behavior and psycho-demographics, and finds matching properties.  Those listings are mailed out or sent over RSS, SMS, Twitter direct message, or FriendFeed to the consumer.

The property valuations come from Onboard’s AVM system, which we believe is not only the most accurate available on the market today, but also the most transparent, as we make our assumptions and our models pretty clear.  That is what allows Foropillas to change variables to look at predictive analysis of what the home should be worth three years out.

Finally, the entire system operates on a common CMS (content management system) built on the Drupal platform.  Each agent and office and staff employee of Foropillas is issued an account, which lets them create blogs and hyperlocal content on the platform.  Data, mapping, and anything else that could drive conversation is widgetized — very similar to the WordPress.com widgets — so that each agent can easily create a sophisticated, templated blog with a profusion of information tools.

This is the mass content aggregation: dynamic content plus data content plus listings, all with a human-centric focus.

Where Nicolai got it wrong was that Foropillas won’t have any agents.  It most assuredly will, because they recognize that the game isn’t to disintermediate realtors, but to empower them.  Also, translations will be available only in Spanish, French, and of course, Greek.

Conclusion

While our client was somewhat caught off-guard about Nicolai’s blowing the whistle on their anticipated launch, we welcome the opportunity to talk about what the website and web tools of the future ought to be:

  • Human-centric search
  • In-depth data content
  • Dynamic realtor-generated content

That is what Onboard makes possible.

For those who have read to this point, or have figured out the anagram already, I want to say thank you.  And I also want to point out that everything written in here about Onboard and our capabilities is absolutely, 100% true.  No April Foolery there.

Which means that Foripollas or Foropillas might be a ruse — but that ruse belongs solely to Mr. Nicolai Kolding, the highly-respected COO of a major national real estate brand :) — but the technology being described is not.  That tech, that level of content depth and breadth, the innovation of lifestyle search — these things are all absolutely real.  Well, except for The Obilizer… we’re waiting on a partner to build that one out.

-rsh

Tags: , , , , , , , , .

March 27th, 2009

8 Crucial Factors for Home Buyers

I know what drove my last two home buying decisions.  And I’ve asked everyone I’ve met for the past few months about what’s driving their decisions. But I wanted to get a broader perspective. So I went out and ordered the National Association of Realtors® Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers 2008.  It was well worth the price.  I have to say, NAR has some great researchers!  I’d highly recommend getting a copy of this if you want to understand who’s buying and what motivates them.

I’d like to share some excerpts from the research and give some examples of how Onboard Informatics’ Lifestyle Listings Engine can be put into action.

I’m going to pause one more time to note that this research was conducted by the National Association of Realtors Research Division.  I’ve tried not to misrepresent the information, misconstrue the results or take credit in any way for their fine work.

Facts and Findings

According to the report, 62% of all home buyers indicated that “quality of the neighborhood” was an important factor in their purchase decision.  There are obviously many factors that influence “quality” including both physical characteristics and overall reputation.  I’d like to dig a bit deeper into people’s heads to turn up how they define “quality.”  I imagine it means a lot of things to a lot of people.  But I am pretty certain that there are lots of variables involved in coming up with the quality judgement.

Sure enough, the NAR research team do drill into many angles and show that criteria vary by age group (young, first-time buyer vs. older, repeat buyer), location type (suburban vs. rural vs. urban), household composition (married couple vs. single female vs. unmarried couple) and other characteristics.  We all know that one “size” does not fit all but this report shows the extent to which that statement is true.

Included here are a swath of factors that influence the purchase decision, in rank order.  I haven’t included all of them in here, just the one that our Lifestyle Listings Engine helps to address (currently).  But trust me when I say that this report goes into MUCH greater detail.

Survey says…

  1. “Convenient to job” was ranked as important by just over half of respondents overall, and nearly 2/3 in urban areas. With Lifestyle Listings Engine, a search can be conducted based on an address (i.e., work address) and a distance (i.e., 30 miles). Coming in the next release will be the ability to enter a desired commute time (i.e. 45 minutes or less) or drive distance (i.e., <30 miles).  When gas prices hit $5+ per gallon again, we’ll see just HOW important this one is.  Oh, and sorry to all my friends around the world who already pay nearly double that :-(
  2. “Convenient to family and friends” was ranked important by over 1/3 of overall respondents and two in five in small towns.  Similar to above, an address or set of addresses may be entered to determine nearby properties.  I also know from personally talking to many retirees that this one ranks very high on their list.
  3. “Convenient to shopping” is important to just over 1/4 of respondents while this inches a bit higher in urban areas. So one of the new capabilities we’ve put into the Lifestyle Listings Engine is the ability to search for listings based on the distance to shopping.  For example, I only want places within 5 miles of a supermarket or pharmacy.
  4. “Quality of the school district” is, no surprise, a crucial factor for over 1/4 of buyers and nearly 1/3 for those looking in the suburbs.  This is directly in line with the fact that roughly 38% of all home buyers have 1 or more child under the age of 18 in the household according to NAR.  So we’ve introduced the ability to search based on school performance using ratings from GreatSchools.  “Find me homes where there’s a GreatSchools rating of 7 or better.”
  5. “Convenient to schools” was important to just over 20% of home buyers.  So just like convenient to shopping, a search can be conducted to find listings within a desired distance to a school.
  6. “Convenient to entertainment/leisure activities” and “convenient to parks/recreational facilities” rank high. Nearly 1/5 of buyers overall want entertainment nearby while this number jumps to 29% in urban areas and over 1/3 in resort areas.  While nearly 1/5 care about parks, especially in urban and resort areas.  So we’ve made it possible to search for listings based on such items as golf courses, swimming pools, parks & playgrounds, cafes, bookstores and libraries.  And we’ll continue to add more amenities.
  7. “Convenient to health facilities” ranks quite a bit lower overall but is important to 2/5 of those looking in resort areas.  So we’ve enabled search based on distance to hospitals as well.
  8. “Convenient to airport” is important to just under 10%, especially in urban areas.  So we’ve also made it possible to find listings within a desired distance to an airport.  For the rest, they can make sure they’re far way from an airport so there’s a double benefit.

There are a number of other crucial factors that go into the search and decision process that we’re working out solutions for.  But I’ll hold off talking about those until the next release.

If you’re interested in the mean time, details about the first two releases of Lifestyle Listings Engine and other posts regarding lifestyle search can be found out Lifestyle Listings Engine and property Search – Related Posts.

We’ve also been doing some of our own research that we’ll begin sharing very soon.  I will say that our direct focus groups mirror what NAR’s research already confirms–there are many factors that influence the home buying decision that have nothing to do with the home itself.  But we’re also taking it a but further to understand how people go about searching.  We got some very interesting insights into how frustrating it is to conduct a home search.  And we can’t wait to share those insights and come up with solutions where we can.

As always, I appreciate your feedback, comments, criticisms and ideas.  Feel free to email me me at spetronis@onboardinformatics.com.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , .

March 23rd, 2009

Form & Function: Continuing the Debate of UI vs. Functionality

It is the pervading law of all things organic and inorganic,
Of all things physical and metaphysical,
Of all things human and all things super-human,
Of all true manifestations of the head,
Of the heart, of the soul,
That the life is recognizable in its expression,
That form ever follows function. This is the law.

-Louis Sullivan

At a panel discussion I moderated recently at RE Tech South on “The Future of Real Estate Search”, a very interesting point was made by the assembled panelists.  (And it was a rockstar-filled panel: Corey Kozlowski of Diverse Solutions, Rudy Bachraty of Trulia, Andrew Tillman of Center for Realtor Technology, Greg Tracy of Blueroof.com, Dan Woolley of Dwellicious, and David Carroll or softRealty.com)

The question was whether UI (user interface/design) is more important than Functionality (the actual search logic/behavior).  The panelists were nearly unanimous in saying that UI > Functionality.

Greg Robertson of Dwellicious followed up on Twitter with an excellent observation:

@robhahn asks at #RETS would you tell agents to spend more money on a web designer(UI) or a programmer to improve search. Panel says UI.  If panelist agree UI is more important than search then it doesn’t bode well for @robhahn (OnBoard) lifestyle neighborhood search.

Because we were so limited on time (30 minutes to get a discussion with six panelists?) I really didn’t have the chance to get that discussion going.  But that’s what blogs are for, right?

I made a semi-serious point to Greg via Twitter that it wasn’t whether panelists agreed that UI > Functionality that bodes ill for our Lifestyle Listings Engine, but whether they were right or not.  I’m going to argue (surprise!) that actually, functionality trumps user interface when it comes to foundational enabling technology.

Form Follows Function!

Form Follows Function!

Form Follows Function: We All Agree!

The principle that form follows function has been a cornerstone of modern architecture and design for over a hundred years (Sullivan wrote his manifesto in 1896).  And it has been adapted in large part into the art and science of user interface design.

In fact, the entire notion of “user interface design” is premised upon using visual, audio, and textual cues to help a user accomplish something.  Otherwise, it would simply be called “graphic design”.

And I think Greg Robertson would agree with that.  Design is not how something looks, but how it works.

The real question then, is not whether UI/design should be divorced from functionality for the sake of satisfying some designer’s creative urge, (and to be fair, none of the panelists were making this claim) but which takes priority for the real estate web: user interface design or functionality.

On Priority: Argument for Why UI > Function

The strongest argument that UI trumps functionality is that the greatest functionality in the world doesn’t mean jack if it’s hidden behind crappy UI.  If folks can’t figure out how to use a thing, then it don’t much matter what that thing can do.

For example, take a look at this:

Powerful! If you know how to use it...

Powerful! If you know how to use it...

This is a tool for building and executing SQL queries.  Given any set of real estate data — including listings data — the functionality of a tool like this is enormous.  You can probably find whatever property you may be looking for, narrow down results quickly, and so on.

But it is safe to say that a real estate search site that simply puts a SQL query front-end as its “Find a Property” interface will fail miserably.  Unless you have a specialized practice catering only to database administrators.  In which case you’re probably going to be out of business soon enough.

In today’s real estate world, what determines success or failure is user interface design.  Companies like Trulia, Blueroof, Diverse Solutions, and softRealty spend thousands of manhours and millions of dollars creating compelling user experience for search.  That these websites hold a competitive advantage over a poorly designed site is readily demonstrated by traffic analysis or simply by putting a consumer in front of a computer.

(It should also be mentioned that far too few brokerages and agents pay enough attention to UI design.  Greg Tracy said, after reviewing a circa-1997 website, that it looked a lot like most realtor websites in 2009.)

Functionality vs. Enabling Technology

On the other hand, there is a distinction to be drawn between “functionality” and “enabling technology” — what one might call a foundational functionality.

For example, Adobe Flash is enabling technology.  It enables all manner of other functionality.  Things that could only be dreamt of before that technology is introduced are now made possible.

Google Maps is also arguably foundational functionality, because it expands the universe of what is possible.  It seems to me that the introduction of Housingmaps.com by Paul Rademacher in 2005 was the seminal breakthrough for real estate web.  (In fact, Housingmaps.com may have been the spark that lit the Web 2.0 fire.)

The Primogen of the Real Estate Web 2.0

The Original: Housingmaps.com, which triggered Real Estate Web 2.0

After Google Maps (and Housingmaps.com), it seemed that you could not design a real estate website without incorporating listings with a map display.  All of the second-generation real estate websites of today owe a huge debt to the original Housingmaps.com and to Google Maps.

The key point here is that design, and user interface, naturally followed these foundational functionalities.  Once the enabling technology made it possible to put listings information right on top of a graphical map, the user interface had to adapt to make that possible.  Search boxes shrank in size, moved to the margins, etc. in order to accommodate the screen real estate of a map.  Designers began to put links into the pop-up bubbles, and map-based search began to make an appearance.

At the same time, however, as Dan Woolley of Dwellicious mentioned on the panel itself, while visualization of search results took a giant leap forward with the introduction of mapping, the property search itself hasn’t changed very much since the earliest days of the real estate web.  We are still living in the Zip/Bed/Bath world for the most part — map-based search is the sole exception.

Whether it is Realtor.com of 1996 or Trulia of 2009, the paradigm of search itself has not changed much: property features/characteristics within a geographical boundary.

That paradigm is what we have set out to change with Lifestyle Listings Engine (LLE).

Enabling Functionality

Our view is that if we are successful with LLE, we will enable a range of new functionality that is currently unavailable on the real estate web.  And that this new set of functionality is something that consumers are hungry for.

The theory — which we are testing, by the way — is that when people go to perform a property search online, they are actually not looking for a “3BR, 2BA house in 07054 under $700K”.  Our theory is that what people are actually looking for is something like: “Someplace with enough space for the kids, with good schools, that we can afford on my husband’s salary… and boy, it’d be nice if there were some decent restaurants nearby.”

In conversation after conversation — and now, in focus group session after focus group session — we are finding that consumers have a picture in their head of what they want.  Usually, these pictures are very hazy.  It takes time and a good deal of research to go from hazy desires to defined set of criteria like “3BR, 2BA, $700K in 07054″.  The process is filled with frustration, dead-ends in research, and a real sense of powerlessness on the part of consumers.

We think that consumers would use a tool that can more directly translate what is in their heads to results on a webpage.  We believe that this functionality will drive a new period of real innovation in the real estate web.  We think that talented developers and designers within real estate can’t wait to get their hands on a new toolset that will help them deliver new ways to answer consumer questions.  LLE is not, in my opinion, “lifestyle search”; rather, it makes “lifestyle search” possible.

That will require excellent user interface design.  Just as the introduction of mapping (and related GIS concepts) to real estate brought forth a new generation of user interface design, I believe that “lifestyle search” will change the user interface in fundamental ways.

I don’t know what that UI will be.  Is it a single-field natural language search, like Google’s?  Is it a set of dials and levers and sliders, similar to Kayak?  Who knows?  But I do know this:

That UI will follow function.

This is the law.

-rsh

Tags: , , , , , , , .

March 13th, 2009

Onboard’s “Social” Calendar

The employees of Onboard Informatics are out and about attending events, speaking on panels, hosting focus groups and networking with fellow tweeters. Here is a brief list of where you can meet employees and talk about data, lifestyle search, local content and so much more.

REtechSouth: Friday, March 20th in Atlanta, GA

Onboard Informatics is not only a sponsoring company of this one-day, real estate technology and networking event, but our very own VP of Marketing, Rob Hahn will be speaking on not one, but two panel discussions.

At 9:00am,  Rob will be joining an impressive list of panelists to discuss the “State of the REUnion.”The panelists include, Sherry Chris, President & CEO of Better Homes & Garden Real Estate, Dan Forsman, President & Owner of Prudential George Realty, and David Boehmig, President of Atlanta Fine Homes Sotheby’s International Realty. Brad Nix, co-founder of REtechSouth, managing broker and co-owner of Maxsell Real Estate, as well as Matt Fagioli, Chief Evangelist at Diamond Dwellings and co-founder of REtechSouth, will also participate in this important discussion.

At 11:00am, Rob will be participating in a session entitled, “The Cage Match: One on One Duel” with Joe Ferrara, a real estate attorney and broker in New York as well as the publisher of theSellsius Real Estate Marketing Blog.

At 2:30pm, Rob will be moderating a lively discussion on “Building a Better Mousetrap: the Next Generation of Search.” Joining the panel is Corey Kozlowski, Internet Product specialist for Diverse Solutions, Rudy Bachraty, the resident Social Media Guru at Trulia.com, Andrew Tillman, from the Center for REALTOR® Technology, Greg Tracy, founder of Blueroof.com, Dan Woolley, co-founder of W&R Studios and the creator of Dwellicious and David Carroll, the founder and visionary of SoftRealty.com

If you are attending REtechSouth, please leave us a comment or track us down. We would enjoy chatting with you.

Leading Real Estate Companies of the World: Thursday, March 26 – Saturday, March 28 in Scottsdale, Arizona.

Onboard Informatics is an Exhibiting Sponsor and will be a part of the Networking Night being held on Thursday evening, March 26th. Additionally on Friday morning March 27th, our VP of Strategic Development, Dave Collins, will be joining a panel discussion entitled, “Taking Your Web Presence to the Next Level for Maximum ROI.” The session will be moderated by Eric Bryn, VP of Strategic Development and Neil Elver, also from the Leading RE network.

Dave will be joining Stephen Schweickart from Realty Video USA, and Marc Davison from 1000WattConsulting.

GreenPearl.com: April 7th: New York, NY

Rob Hahn has been asked to participate in a Social Media Marketing Panel Discussion, specifically for real estate professionals. The discussion will include Jonathan Miller, Doug Heddings, Allie Herzog, Rick Rochon.

REALTORS® Mid-year Legislative Meeting & Expo: May 13-15: Washington, D.C.

Onboard Informatics is a proud sponsor of RISMedia’s Power Broker Forum, being held at the REALTORS® Mid-year Legislative Meeting & Expo. A dinner and networking event will follow the forum.

RE BarCamp: May 27th: Philadelphia, PA  

Onboard data experts will be in attendance and are looking forward to hosting a topic that day. You can find additional, real-time information on Twitter, using the hashtag #rebcphl.

Re BarCamp: June 12th: Boston, MA

Since Philly and Boston are relatively close to our headquarters in NYC, we are looking forward to spending quality time with our fellow real estate social media colleagues. The hashtag on Twitteris #rebcbos.

Onboard has plans to participate in additional events during the second half of the year and information will be posted during the upcoming months. Our eyes are always open for new event marketing opportunities, so if you know of any or are creating one, please email us at info@onboardinformatics.com.

- Stacey Ret

 Subscribe

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , .

February 5th, 2009

The Future of Real Estate Search

Okay, so when we initially conceived of the Lifestyle Search Essay Contest, I was pretty excited to lock-in the $500 prize.  I mean, I know a thing or two about lifestyle search, I know the judges, and I’ve got some creative ideas, y’know?  I figure I’m a lock, so I’m debating between buying a PlayStation 3 or a new video card with the $500 that I’m sure to win.

Then I read this:

You do not have to be a client of Onboard.  And Onboard employees can submit, but cannot win.  [ED: So no money for you, Rob.]

Wow. How cold is that?  Can you believe Megan threw me under the bus like that?

Nonetheless, because this is a topic near and dear to my heart personally (and professionally), I offer this non-eligible essay.

Types of Search

As I see it, there are actually two different kinds of “search”: Browsing, and Trying-To-Find.

Oh, Im just looking! Dont need any help... yet.

Oh, I'm just looking! Don't need any help... yet.

My wife likes to engage in the former, especially when the object being searched involves things with tags like Prada.  She can spend hours in a store and walk out with nothing, but have thoroughly enjoyed herself.

Psychologically, I think people enjoy seeing “what’s out there” even if they’re not really feeling any urgency about finding anything.  Whether that’s clothing, or computer equipment, or gadgets, or cars, or houses, people like just “looking around” to see what’s being offered for sale.  (Incidentally, this is why people buy magazines to read the ads; they’re interested in seeing what’s new.)

Most browsers are not going to turn into buyers.  But some do.  Whether it’s the impulse buy, or the “Oh my god, what a great deal!” (which often results in purchases one regrets years later while look at old photographs…), browsers aren’t really in the market, but then again, they sort of are.

Let’s call this “search as entertainment” because these people are really just amusing themselves.  They’re the ones who love to look at window displays to see the creativity, or look at mannequins to see how the merchandiser put outfits together.

Trying-to-Find people are different: they have a definite goal in mind.  Men usually shop for clothing this way.  They know exactly what they need — “I need to buy a new tie” — and don’t really want to browse racks upon racks, being overwhelmed with choices.  They would much prefer walking into a store, walking up to a salesperson, saying something like, “I need to buy a tie that goes with a blue suit”, and walking out five minutes later with said tie in hand.

These folks get frustrated when the process between the start of searching and the actual finding of the item is (a) too complicated, (b) takes too long, or (c) results in nothing.  And too many choices is cognitively the same as “nothing” since you can’t possibly choose between three hundred ties.

Let’s call this “search as research” since these people are really looking to make a decision.  The information gathering involved in search is basically research that will provide enough justification to make a decision: this tie, or that one.

Real Estate Search

The trouble with real estate search, in my oh-so-humble opinion, is that it is not entertaining and is too fragmented to be research.

Sure some of the sites out there, like Estately, can be sorta fun.  And Trulia has a lot of fun with their celebrity homes stuff.  But really, browsing for housing isn’t as fun as, say browsing through Ebay, just messing around Amazon, or even going to high-end fashion sites.

So my vision of search incorporates, on the one hand, a really entertaining aspect to it.  It should be FUN to browse for houses.  Lifestyle search can accomplish this.

One of the greatest works of American cinema, with incredible real-life backstory

One of the greatest works of American cinema, with incredible real-life backstory

Imagine being able to search based on “my favorite books”.  How about a “Top Five Movies” list, then the system spits back houses located in areas where people share my taste in movies?  (My Top Five Movies, incidentally, are The Godfather, All About Eve, Broadcast News, Braveheart, and Aliens.)  For the browsing public, there should be hundreds of specialized, fun applications based on lifestyle search.

If you’re Maxim, have a “Rentals near single young femmes” search widget.  Bon Appetit could have searches within 10 minute distance of restaurants of famous chefs.  The possibilities are bounded only by the imagination.

On the flipside, for people who are really in the market and looking to find a great place to live, a slick implementation of full lifestyle search will cut down the time and effort between starting the search, and actually finding a manageable number of properties.  This satisfies the “search as research” people.

Instead of wondering, as Daniel does, what the schools nearby a property are like, the future real estate search simply allows for direct filtering or direct search based on schools — both relative criteria (“show me only houses within districts in the top 10% of state”) or absolute criteria (“if the school isn’t at least a 8, forget it”).  And with intuitive user interface (maybe sliders or dials) the serious-research people can balance cost vs. convenience vs. fun vs. schools vs. taxes vs. whatever is important to them.  The goal is to cut down the universe of possibilites from thousands to perhaps six or so properties, quickly.

My ideal search, when in “serious research mode”, should help me hone in on the five or six homes I should really look at within 15 minutes of starting the search.  And it should be accurate, such that I don’t curse the system for its many errors as I start to look into each of them, and the neighborhoods they’re in.

Go forth, my minions, and find me homes!

Go forth, my minions, and find me homes!

Going Beyond the Web

Furthermore, the “search” isn’t limited to just something done on a website or via mobile.  It can become a crowdsourcing platform.

Perhaps, with the push of a button, all of my various search criteria can be broadcast (syndicated?) to a host of people (realtors? friends? family?) so that they can tap into their offline knowledge to help me find what I’m really looking for.

“Oh, honey, you only think you want to live near the beach,” my mother might think upon seeing my criteria.  “You sunburn too easily; you need to be near the mountains.”

A realtor might see the “ISO” (In Search Of) criteria and realize that although I wasn’t thinking of his area, it would actually be perfect, and send me three or four properties to look at given my criteria.

A sort of eHarmony for Homes could send me alerts when a “match” occurs between my numerous criteria and something that just hit the market, “based on twenty-six dimensions of compatibility”.

All of this means that real estate search saves me time, energy, and money, and reduces the stress and PITA factor of looking for a new house.

Fun And Useful

That’s what I want.  That’s my ideal search.  Something that can be entertaining on the one hand, but powerful on the other to help me drill down very quickly to finding, instead of merely looking for, what I want.

-rsh

Tags: , , .

February 2nd, 2009

We’re not the only ones thinking about search…

Since we announced our new product, Lifestyle Listings Engine, a few weeks ago at Inman Connect, I’ve noticed a ton of conversations and debate over Search…where it is and where it’s going.

The general consensus seems to be that there’s going to be a lot of change in the way people search for a home or at least there needs to be. What’s interesting is that everyone seems to agree that search needs to shift from being all about the listing to a blend of listing and lifestyle information, yet there still isn’t anyone that’s successfully accomplished this.

Yet…

Check out what’s being said by the industry experts regarding real estate search…

Lifestyle search is the new black, by Joel Burslem, Future of Real Estate Marketing blog

Onboard and the Lifestyle Listings Engine, Drew Meyers, Geek Estate blog

Real estate search is messed up, just look, Daniel Rothamel, RealEstateZebra.com.

Real Estate Debate , Joe Ferrara, Sellsius Real Estate Blog, Rob Hahn, Notorious R.O.B. blog

Be sure to check back as we will continue to explore the future of real estate search.

Tags: , , , , , , .

January 28th, 2009

Cramming Sounds Like Heartburn Highway

So you bought a house, took advantage of lower interest rates to refinance and were satisfied.  Until the waiter came by and offered you something else, something very tasty:  lowering the principal value of your home and reducing your payments.  Compared to bankruptcy and foreclosure that’s mighty tempting.

What comes to mind is that old Monty Python scene where a harmless seeming, “wafer thin” after dinner mint leads to gastronomic explosion.  And much like that human bomb, messing with principals will upset the neighborhood (the “splatter” effect).

What’s my beef you ask?  Well it seems ok at first glance.  Keep people in their homes.  Right the wrongs of overzealous and unscrupulous lenders and brokers.  Help people out who are losing their jobs.  Find a way to keep people from declaring bankruptcy.  All worthy goals and a big part of the debate over the stimulous bill on Capital Hill.

So here’s part of the issue:  if you reduce the principal on my neighbor’s mortgage, you actually decrease the value basis of his home.  Which is fine for him.  He can now sell it at a lower price and not lose money.  Now do that to more neighbors and you actually decrease the value of my home.  The problem is, you didn’t adjust my investment basis.  So I can’t do what my distressed neighbor can (sell) without incurring a loss.  At which point, I will need to start asking “Why am I still paying my mortgage?”

There’s an issue of fairness here.  By most estimates, 90%+ of homeowners are on time with their mortgage payments.  Sure, a lot of us wish our homes were worth as much as we bought them for. But they aren’t.  And we deal with our investment choice and continue to pay.

Look at the flip side of this:

QUESTION:  What I don’t get is – if its ok for us to lower principals when values drop, why don’t we increase principals when values increase?

ANSWER:  Because a home purchase is an investment.

Investments have risk don’t they?  Since when am I guaranteed a positive return on all of my investments?  Wouldn’t that be a nice easy world to plan for my family’s future security.  And the risk runs both ways.  We don’t allow lenders to reset the value of your mortgage upwards when its in their interest to do so either.

I know.  It sounds cold when you are talking about your neighbor or friend.  But step back from personal considerations and look at the big picture here.  If we institutionalize drops in value, then we are resetting the market.  But unless we reset it for EVERYONE, we end up with a bunch of “winners” (well, compared to getting foreclosed at least) and a whole lot of “losers” (anyone who actually planned well, made a good investment, doesn’t qualify for a cramdown, and just keeps paying).  I’m not the only person thinking this way either (see comments on Inman News).

If the goal is to keep people in their homes, then there are other alternatives.

  • reset EVERYONE’s principal to the current market values (probably an exceedingly bad precedent)
  • keep EVERYONE’s principal where it is but provide payment assistance to those that qualify through deferred interest government loans (let the government keep some of the bailout dollars to back these loans)
  • give EVERYONE their portion of the bailout money directly (a couple hundred thousand dollars would go a long way toward getting people on top of their payments and freeing up discretionary spending again)

Sure, there are huge potential issues with each of these.  But what are our goals?  Perhaps putting money back in the hands of consumers (rather than directly to lending institutions) would be a good idea.  Give renters the funds to buy and watch properties fly off the market.  Give owners the funds to pay their mortgage and the keep (or even increase) the penalties for defaults and bankruptcies, and see people stay in their homes and pay on time.  Keep the lenders’ cashflow coming from where it should be – their investments – and loosen up access to credit again.

On the day after the US Treasury had to call Citigroup and order them to cancel a $45million luxury jet purchase, and when 90% of top executives that were in power in 2006 at the financial institutions receiving bailout money are still in power, why would we think for a second that these institutions will use our money more wisely than we would?

Potential issues with these ideas abound – flooding the consumer space with cash could lead to quick and rapid inflation.  People might spend their money on vacations and flat screens rather than their homes.  “Free money” is bound to have negative impact that I’m not savvy enough to predict.  But at least it would be evenhanded.

I’m not an economic wiz kid. I do know that cramdowns are too much for my stomach to handle.  Cramdowns will hurt the majority of people.   In fact, I think its the equivalent of stealing  directly from all the other homeowner-investors.    We’re seeing strong volume recovery in parts of the country, which will lead to price stability.  Yes, its going to take a while for values to get back to even on what people paid to get into their homes.  But sometimes you need to know when to leave that last bite on your plate and come back to the table when the time is right.

Tags: , , , , , , , .